I have for a very long time struggled through understanding the leadership confusion in the church today.
Why is there so
much corruption in church and faith-based structures?
Why is there so
much unchallenged sin?
I am writing
this as someone who has over the years attempted to challenge sin and
wickedness in churches and Christian groups I have been part of, especially the
ones that were foolish enough to put me in leadership.
And I am saying
foolish because they interpret my passion and commitment to ministry wrongly;
thinking that only zeal separates my practice of religion with theirs.
But it rarely
takes long before what they always assumed as acceptable is challenged by
scripture and godly logic.
I of course try
as much as possible to follow the same scriptures in the challenge.
Allow me to give
an example.
I was at one
time an elected leader of a Christian Union and in a short while the bigger
chaps in the CU became uncomfortable with my presence though they could not do
much about it.
One of my
quarrels with them was passing things and setting ambitious plans that never
worked, some of which did not make much sense.
Why are we
discussing another engagement when we have three previous ones that we had
already decided on yet have done or are doing nothing about them? Was my main
argument.
Why are we
discussing plans for new things instead of discussing the implementation of the
already agreed on plans?
But things came
to a head when they invited a heretic for an overnight meeting. And I didn’t
know him and so went to hear a good preacher. Incidentally he was very
entertaining, even though he could become gross.
I took notes
very studiously.
When the dust
settled, I went back to the notes and started seeing very clear signs of open
heresy, statement so clearly unscriptural.
I was unable to
let that pass as I prayed.
But I had to
also use scripture to challenge that heresy.
I looked for him
(that was before the internet) until I got his postal address (these were the
80s).
I then wrote him
a letter outlining all the points at which he had strayed from the scriptures
and showed him the scriptural position. I also gave him my address, even to the
room I stayed in so that we could examine the scriptures together since I did
not think anybody chooses error wittingly.
Interestingly,
instead of responding to my letter or even seeking my audience, he told the
leaders who had invited him that I had called him a heretic, something I did
not do.
All the other
officials (or probably the big mouthed ones) had some private meetings to
discuss what they needed to do with me.
Then a meeting
was called that I attended without knowing that I was the only agenda.
After the
chairman talking volumes, he got to the point.
Someone called
the preacher a heretic.
That didn’t
affect me since I didn’t, and second, my letter was personal, even seeking an
audience.
They got stuck.
Then I think
somebody else said that he had said that someone had told him that some things
he had taught were unscriptural.
I said I had
told him that.
So, you wrote
the letter?
Of course, from
there pandemonium though it is impossible to mob the truth.
They then kicked
me out of their committee and I walked out knowing that it was because I sought
to right a wrong scripturally.
But what they
did after that was more saddening.
When the time
for the elections of new officials came, due to their fear of me being elected
into office again, probably even being made chairman, they effectively rigged
the whole thing by choosing their people and asking the membership to place
them into positions.
Yet I have never
sought any positions since I responded to God’s call. In fact, I try my best to
avoid them since they are many times a drag on my assignment. And I was very
young then.
Why do such
things happen in the church Christ purchased with His blood? And I say this
because I have witnessed similar things more times than I care to remember.
The first reason
is that we have corrupted the New Testament model.
The New
Testament church did not have an ultimate leader or board. It had accountable
relationships of ministers.
Though Peter was
the pope (according to some), he never was absolute in any way.
Remember when
God sent him to Cornelius?
He had to give
an account of his departure from what the other elders thought was their
mission.
You may also
remember Paul openly rebuking him yet in his letter he writes of him very
highly instead of calling him insubordinate.
Or in Acts 15
when the church has to deal with the inclusion of the gentiles.
The church was
led by very spiritual elders who were placed in those positions by their
relationship with God and how it ministered to the flock.
I do not see any
evidence of elections being done to choose those elders. Their spirituality did
not need any human push to authenticate.
As an example,
how did James (Jesus’ half brother) become a pillar yet we see him with the
rest of his brothers doubting Jesus when the apostles were completely sold out
to Him? How did he overtake them?
You can be sure
that it was not just because he was related to Jesus as we see even Jude,
instead of mentioning about his earthly connection with Jesus was content to
say he was related to James.
God had raised
him to the point that his leadership did not need any trumpeting. Just like
Jesus did not tell His disciples that Peter was the leader they should have
submitted to. Nor did Peter at any time ask to be recognised as a leader. Again
no elections were ever held.
Their
relationships and fellowship were able to shine out the leadership inherent in
each of the disciples without bringing down anybody else.
All were leaders
but Peter and James stood above the rest in the fellowship.
I am sure that
like Paul they did not feel qualified to be leaders because of their past
(James doubted and even challenged Jesus’ authenticity and Peter denied Him).
You may even remember that Jesus sought out the same Peter after His
resurrection.
That is why he
was subject to the other elders since he knew that he was not any better than
they were. And that is why he took Paul’s very ‘humiliating’ rebuke very
positively.
That is the most
glaring difference I see with the modern church.
Challenging a
pastor’s sermon is many times treated as heresy. Questioning a minister’s
conduct is treated as blasphemy. And demanding scriptural explanation for some
crazy things churches do is treated as touching the anointed.
There simply is
no accountability in church leadership.
Of course, there
is a pretence of the same because churches have elders and deacons.
But what sort of
accountability can we have when the same elders and deacons are chosen by the
pastor?
We say that the
church has its foundations on apostles and prophets.
What kind of
foundation are we having when the pastor is the apostle and prophet rolled on
in one?
We have bishops
and overseers (although that is actually the same thing)
Can I oversee
others when I am in the thick of things with my own kiosk?
How can I be a
supervisor of someone’s enterprise when I am running a similar enterprise on
the side?
How can I be a
foreman of someone’s building when I am doing the same on my site?
What I am trying
to make us understand is that we are severely limited in what we can do at any
one time, not only because I cannot be at two places at one time but also
because my mind is unable to focus on several different things at one time.
You can’t be
overseeing several churches when you are also pastoring your own church.
How will you
prioritise between the crisis in your flock and the one in the diocese?
Who will you
rush to rescue between a marriage in your church falling apart and a pastor who
has been kicked out? What between your choir or prayer team falling apart and a
church whose leadership is falling apart will you rush to rescue? And what
between attending a fundraiser in one of the churches you lead and dealing with
the reduction of the contributions churches make that has drastically reduced
your ‘salary’?
We have in our
folly of seeking to be in control lost the essence of Christ’s ministry.
Holding a title
has become more important than functioning in it.
Feeding off a
title has become of greater worth than feeding others using it.
Personal
emolument is a greater driver than self sacrifice.
No wonder
accountability structures are hated and dreaded when they cannot be avoided.
That is why
church constitutions are more frequently changed than the political ones;
because the man or men at the top does not want his foibles to be legally
challenged.
That is why
retirement ages are always being pushed higher and higher because the big fish
would rather die in office than raise a Timothy or a Titus or a Mark.
And they fear
retirement because they know they have absolutely no spiritual investment on
the ground since they poured it all into their stomach or their cronies.
The only
spiritual war they fight is against their growing irrelevance in the spiritual.
And that since the devil doesn’t really mind their high-sounding proclamations
and declarations since they are doing absolutely nothing to threaten his kingdom.
I have thrown
this stone to rouse some reflection on our values and structures.
Why do Peter and
John call themselves elders and not apostles in their epistles?
Wherefore, if
I come, I will remember his deeds which he doeth, prating against us with
malicious words: and not content therewith, neither doth he himself receive the
brethren, and forbiddeth them that would, and casteth them out of the church. (3John 1:10)
As an aside,
could John have been able to plan such trips if he was running his own
congregation? And how many such trips could he have been able to plan on a
regular basis?
And how could
Peter have been able to be out of Jerusalem for so long during the Dorcas and
Cornelius ministries if he had had a congregation he was pastoring?
I believe the
essence of oversight demands freedom from attachment.
In fact, even
the elder demands someone with grown children according to the Bible. Because
only then can someone be able to spend more time on church affairs without
sacrificing his family.
That is why we
see Samuel failing on the family front even as he excelled ministry wise.
I am writing
this sitting on the elder seat as I am learning the ropes of my
responsibilities.
Allow me to give
you a small glimpse of a typical day in my very relaxed schedule. And I will
write about the ‘abnormal’ things occupying it.
I wake up before
six to switch on the Audio Bible I broadcast to my neighbours.
When I switch it
off at eight, I will many times sit down on the computer to write these
messages as God releases them. And I do it in the morning for two main reasons.
My mind and
spirit are at their freshest in the morning and my solar system is not big
enough to work on later if I must have adequate power at night.
After that I
will more or less relax and wait for ministry, many times in terms of calls
And I receive
calls!
Calls requiring
counsel. Calls asking for ministry direction. Calls requiring encouragement.
There are times
I can spend up to four hours on a single call.
Other times God
would ask me to also buy adequate minutes and reach out to people needing
ministry, some we have not had contact for years.
The bulk of
those calls are from ministers (the majority beingserving pastors) and dealing
with ministry issues. God using my ministry experience to guide others into the
ropes of ministry as they are growing, though some of them may have been in
ministry for as long or even longer than I have been; the difference being that
the model God has released for me to use is much more radical than theirs.
During that
time, I would also be on my small piece of land looking at the progress of my
fruit trees and dealing with any eventualities (I never thought trees would
demand so much attention); pests, lack of water, stray growth, etc.
Mid afternoon
would find me heading to the shops, choosing the ones that are far and using the
routes with less traffic for the purposes of getting adequate time to meditate
but also open myself up for ministry. And there are times that twenty-minute
journey could take over two hours for the ministry God would bring.
Would that be
possible in my previously fast-moving ministry seasons?
How possible
would it be for me to detach from my very pressing ministry engagements to
create that much time consistently to guide someone in a position similar to
mine? How easy would it be for me to kick out a counselee to focus on a
struggling pastor?
There are times
when I have to travel of course.
I would receive
calls and be saddened because there is no way I could do the ministry I always
easily do because I am in a public vehicle or in a meeting or in someone’s
shop.
God dramatically
scaled down my writing ministry for the same reason. And I had to stop much of
the publishing, even for missions’ materials because God needs that ‘idle’ time
to use me properly as an elder. I had to source for other ministers to continue
doing it.
What I am saying
is that an elder needs to be freely available to be of much use since crises do
not give any advance notice.
He needs to be
occupied in affairs that would be able to easily release him to respond to whatever
crisis God would release his way without having to leave other crises in the
wake.
That is how the
African nations operated.
Incidentally,
that also appears to be the way Israel operated.
How many times
do you read of elders being found on the city gates? What would their purpose
be if not to respond to societal situations as they arose.
You are
therefore not a Biblical elder if you are occupying an ecclesiastical office
even if you are a hundred years old. And by continuing to force that position
you are denying yourself much usefulness and fulfilment to get the pittance you
continue receiving as a bishop, senior pastor, apostle, general overseer,
archbishop and any other title you may think befits your position.
You are denying
the church of Christ your walk of faith by living so selfishly. And it is sad
because you are becoming what Christ called some, hireling.
Detach yourself
from that pay package to be of any use to the church of Christ.
And I know I am
offending some immensely. But if I do not say this, who will?
Pray through
this ‘offense’ and allow God to speak to your situation specifically since this
post speaks in a general way.
No comments:
Post a Comment