Then the high priest rose up, and all they that were with him, (which
is the sect of the Sadducees,) and were filled with indignation, And laid their
hands on the apostles, and put them in the common prison. (Acts 5: 17, 18)
I want us to look at the church
of today and its most popular theology and doctrine. By church I am not talking
about the church of Christ but the visible church, the institutional church.
This is because the two are completely different entities in the scriptures.
I have been seeking to understand
why the Gospel we so frequently proclaim does not have the transforming power
we see when we read the Bible and look at our recent past. It has so disturbed
me and I have been praying to understand why. Some of my recent posts have been
posing the same question.
That is when God opened my eyes
to the Sadducees. They exemplify the church and leadership of our day.
Who were the Sadducees? They were
the spiritual and political leadership of the Jewish people during Christ’s
time. They did not believe in the supernatural, were partial with the
scriptures and had no problem with Romans. They occupied all the high
ecclesiastical offices and had no problems bribing, even killing to have their
way.
One thing you realise when you
read the Bible is that every other group or class of people got saved after the
resurrection; soldiers, publicans, harlots, Pharisees, scribes, Romans, etc. But
have you ever realised that there is no record at all of a single Sadducee
getting saved?
Yet they continued exercising
spiritual authority over Israel. Until we get to the close of Acts we see them
persecuting the church of Christ.
Jesus had no time for their
depravity clothed in spirituality. Do you realise that He never argued with
them? That his rebukes were directed at Pharisees and scribes?
It appears farfetched but is it
possible that the Sadducees were beyond redemption?
Pharisees and scribes believed
the scriptures and the God of the scriptures. Their problem was that Christ did
not look or behave like the messiah they were expecting. Connecting Jesus to
the scriptures was all they needed to believe in Him. Their theology was open
to new revelation because they believed in God who was beyond comprehension.
Their theology had a ‘what if?’
clause concerning God. Remember Gamaliel resorting to it? And we also see them
going back to it when Paul is being questioned after his first arrest.
But there was nothing like that
with the Sadducees. From the history of the time between the testaments, we
know that they would even kill to get or have one of their own becoming high
priest. They went to great lengths to access the power that office offered. It is
not surprising that we have a son in law inheriting his in law as high priest
yet from the scriptures that position flowed from a father to his son. That is
why during the time of Christ all the devout Levites were relegated to being
scribes. Of course a Sadducee could not have touched that profession as they
could not have taken such backbreaking and unrewarding responsibility just to
obtain the favor of a God they only used to profit and access power.
They lived for the present. The
correct word to describe them spiritually is eunuchs, meaning that eternal and
spiritual fruit was to them as implausible as a child to a eunuch. Sin for them
was subjective and only depended on their comfort. Remember they bribed the
soldiers who witnessed the resurrection to hush their testimony? Remember them
playing a political game on Pilate to ensure he kills Christ?
What is the preaching in vogue
these days? Is it not bound in the here and now?
Let us look at the common
preachers of today. Do you realize that there is very little of eternity in it,
if it ever is? Do you realize that the more popular a preacher is, the less he
mentions the need to convert from our pursuits to God’s revelation?
All the preaching these days is
completely focused on the here and now. If eternity is ever mentioned, it is to
stop people like me from asking uncomfortable questions to those peddlers of
mammon.
According to this doctrine, a
blessing is composed of 100% what happens here; what God must and will give us,
how comfortable God will make us, etc.
They mention Job and Abraham
without realizing that the makeup of their blessing was the trashing of the
here and now for the joy of knowing and following God. As an example, Job was
not cursed when he had lost everything, even his health. Yet we realize that
after losing it all he fell down and worshipped. He spoke of seeing God even
when his body wasted away. Remember him saying, ‘though He slay me, yet will I
trust him’? Even Abraham’s life was one of giving up this or the other in his
pursuit of God.
We are blessed ONLY because we
have God as He is the source of all blessing. Things can never account for
blessing, unless we are followers of the doctrine of the Sadducees. Otherwise
tell me how blessed these rich men who have no shame making harlots of
university students just because they have the money. Yet you will sadly find
some very ‘successful’ pastors joining that throng. How blessed are those who
sell their souls to the devil to become rich?
Yet that is what most pulpits are
spewing all the time. Success is only defined using worldly standards. We do
not seem to care that the world is rushing headlong to hell yet some are
leaders of churches who have never heard of the invitation to repent and pursue
the knowledge of God. They are oohing and aahing the fraudster thinking he is a
pastor sent from God yet it is a Sadducee only interested in what they have to
offer.
The sad thing is that very few
can see the temporal, even folly of that doctrine.
We will not drive to heaven. In
fact we will not even carry a handkerchief with us to heaven. And eternity is a
very long time to regret. Look at what Jesus said.
For what shall it profit a man, if he shall gain the whole world, and
lose his own soul? Or what shall a man give in exchange for his soul? (Mark
8: 36, 37)
Good health is good, and very
enjoyable. But is that the definition of a blessing?
Jesus promised Peter that he will
have health issues prior to his death. Paul found a great revelation as he
sought to understand his health challenges. Does it mean that God hated them?
Is it that they had sinned? Does it mean that they did not have requisite
faith?
Psalm 73 was written by a
believer who sought to understand the doctrine we are talking about. And he was
able to see God’s reality because he had God as his reference. Do we question
these peddlers of the doctrine of the Sadducees? Would we believe the devil if
he came holding a Bible or quoting from it? Because that is the crux of the
matter.
We can’t continue talking only
about what God will do for us. Our responsibility is to know exactly what God
expects from us because then it automatically opens God to do His part. And
giving those con artists is not giving God because they are not taking you to
heaven, because they are not going there. They are teaching you to maximize on
this life as it is the only life they are pursuing. Eternity and its
requirements are too faint a mirage that they just mention it in passing.
Read the Bible for yourself
before you accuse me of touching your anointed. Because he just might be having
your anointing and nothing of God’s.
I will probably build on this
later. But in summary, be wary of preachers who do not preach against sin. Look
out for preachers who are content with your spiritual immaturity. Avoid
preachers who rarely, if ever mention heaven and hell as real destinations that
we will go according to the way we live this life.
And of some have compassion, making a difference: And others save with
fear, pulling them out of the fire; hating even the garment spotted by the
flesh. (Jude 1: 22, 23)
Does you pastor paint such
urgency for evangelism in his preaching?
No comments:
Post a Comment