I will continue irritating some of you by writing about politics and political leadership.
Let me start by asking a simple question.
What do you use to gauge a successful parent?
A successful parent is simply one who has raised all his
children to independence.
Success of the children is not enough for the parent if his
very educated and jet set offspring are always coming to him to beg for
sustenance. It is frustrating if his very successful children are refusing to
leave home because the world for them is a hard place. It is not success if all
his sons and daughters are bringing him children to raise. It is not success if
he must be consulted before the smallest decision is made. And it is not
success if the successful children use their success on immorality and
substance abuse.
The mark of a successful parent is foresight.
He will get a child who can do nothing for himself and over
time transform him into someone who is raising many others to great heights.
A leader is (or should be) exactly the same.
It is very sad that many of the people who love being called
leaders are lords of poverty, to borrow from one of them.
They thrive in fighting to maintain poverty levels so that
they can buy support and votes very cheaply.
An empowered populace is a very dangerous thing for them as
they will have nobody to ‘fight’ for.
Let me mention security.
A functional country is not one where police patrol to deter
or fight criminals because then we will need a policeman for every five or so
people.
A functional state is one where someone can leave their gate
open overnight without worrying whether anything will be stolen from their
compound. And that will happen when everybody is empowered and can comfortably
live.
In our country, only the armed forces are allowed to carry
weapons. It is therefore illegal for me to arm myself to protect what is mine.
The state will not make me safe by placing a policeman at my
gate at night. They will do so by ensuring that none of my neighbors sleeps
hungry or is unable to raise his children.
Disparity is a normal thing. Remember God saying that the
poor will always be with the Israelites, unless they choose to follow His
commandments and instructions?
But disparity has its limits.
When some rich are stinking rich (meaning they smell bad for
their riches), and the poor are hopelessly poor, then we have a huge problem in
our hands. The balance has been tipped badly.
In my childhood we were poor and there were some who were
better.
A neighbor drove a lorry (Americans call them trucks) for a
wholesaler in town and once in a while would have it stay overnight at his
place.
The next morning the children from the whole village would
be gathered at his gate.
Do you know why? He would carry all of them to school.
That vehicle ‘belonged’ to him. But it was the
responsibility of the whole village to protect it because it served them.
Let me give you another story, again of people I know.
This family was very rich (according to those times) as both
the husband and wife had cars at a time very few people had shoes.
But they were also proud.
They therefore did not offer anybody a lift in their
vehicles as they would dirty them. They were reserved for the family, for many
years.
Then one day the man of the house had an accident and the
vehicle lay on him, for lack of better words, not far from his home.
Do you know what the neighbors did and said?
We are sorry we do not want to dirty your car. Let us run to
call the ones who will not dirty it.
They then ran to the mzee’s home to call the ones who were
there.
Of course the weight on him could not wait for the deserving
people to arrive and that is how he died.
You might think the neighbors were wicked.
But think of this person who had to trek for hours with a
sick child to the nearest place they can get some transport. Think of the
person who was rushing to an emergency and the vehicle blew dust on him and
refused to even acknowledge his raised hands. Think of the mother who delivered
on the roadside as the same vehicle passed them struggling. Think of the person
whose loved one died because the way to hospital was too long.
Unlike our situation, those vehicles did not belong to the
community. And that because their owners did not belong to the community. As
such none owed the other anything.
It is such situations leaders should be seeking to rectify
by making sure that the disparities are not so extreme and that the community is
not so fragmented.
A leader who invests in his and his cronies’ betterment is
worse than useless. He is dangerous to society, and of course to himself.
This is because he will be increasing the disparity to
dangerous levels. The gap between citizens and the ruler and his cronies will
reach unmanageable levels because they are the ones eating all the taxes
whereas the ones paying those taxes get nothing in return.
It will eventually reach a point where the populace will
become desperate. Then even if the army protects them and their wealth, it
would not make much of a difference as they will essentially have nothing to
lose.
The last time I posted on leadership I mentioned the fact
that compared to our neighbors, animal feeds are too expensive as to make
animal farming feasible. Farm inputs are too expensive as to make crop
husbandry also unfeasible.
The fact that we must import so much food from neighboring
countries, countries whose weather is not different from ours; the sad fact
being that their food is many times cheaper that what we produce even after
transportation.
For this I will give an A for uselessness in leadership.
Another thing I will say that makes me call our leadership
useless is the fact that though we produce our own power, people and companies
are shifting to solar and investing billions to do so.
All because we have a utility power company that eats and
eats and eats without caring what those they are eating from are getting in
return.
That a company without competition can operate at a loss is
a clear indictment of the government and its leaders. It goes without say that
they are the ones eating the utility company.
In a short while we will be asked to bail out the company
again because they have too much power without consumers because they chased
them away.
In the past we used to buy crude oil and refine it. Now we
have oil and the leaders are telling us that it is not feasible to refine it
ourselves.
We must therefore sell it crude and buy it refined.
If that is not folly, we must look for another dictionary.
Why should I sell my unshelled maize to my neighbor to later
buy it after he shells it?
These are some of the things I am challenging people to look
at when considering who to vote for.
A leader worth his salt is one whose leadership reduces his
influence by empowering his populace and not the other way round.
Just look at David.
He started with useless rejects but later was comfortable
having them making decisions for him, with some even rebuking him and he did
not retaliate because he had accomplished his leadership mandate.
David made his people richer and was the better for it.
Solomon made Israel richer and lost the kingdom due to that as his people were
the ones who paid the price for the same.
You never go down by lifting others, especially those way
down the ladder.
Infrastructure without corresponding people empowerment is
for me the epitome of greed as the leaders want to have the best for themselves,
even roads that only they can use as nobody else can afford to use.
I am Christ’s minister and not a politician and must say
things as I feel heaven needs them said.
No comments:
Post a Comment