How do we avoid those toxic relationships?
How do we evade
the common purse that offends God?
It is important
to look at our fathers of the faith to get our lesson.
Abraham ran away
from those partnerships even when the other partners requested them.
Remember when he
was seeking a burial place for Sarah?
He refused to be
given under any circumstances.
Receiving a gift
unites someone with the source of that gift.
Remember also
when he rescued Sodom?
Again, he
refused his dues, however entitled he was to them.
Remember his
argument?
Lest you say
that you made Abraham rich.
A gift is a
shortcut and a trap. It is the easiest way to unite purses.
Look also at him
and Isaac in the case of wells.
They insisted on
using water from the wells they had dug instead of sharing the available ones.
And even with
Jacob they insisted on building on the plots of land they had purchased instead
of the easily available lands as custom may have dictated.
Jacob insists of
being paid by his father-in-law instead of sharing the wealth he had helped
increase.
A common purse
is a covenant with ambiguous terms. It is a covenant with shifting goalposts.
The worst part
of it is that once entered it is almost impossible to exit because I continue
enjoying the spoils of the same.
Treat this as an
opening of our eyes to the devious nature of purses and the corrosive influence
they exert.
And it does not
only happen when Jehoshaphat meets Ahab.
It might happen
when both were in their prime spiritual condition.
But it doesn’t
stop when one party backslides or deserts the faith.
What do you
think happened to Uzziah’s purse partners when he became a leper? What do you
think happened to Asa’s purse friends when he lost God’s favor?
I believe the
common purse is the reason repentance becomes very difficult for most, because
there are friends who are ready to accompany you to hell due to that purse.
There are friends who will stand with you no matter what because you are
sharing a common purse.
That is why
corrupt governments only change from a revolution, because there are purses
supporting even the killers of their people. And they do not support because
they agree with what they do. They only support because of the common purse
they share.
Probably the
most powerful way to avoid common purses as ministers is doing what David did;
diverting all the gifts and emoluments to God’s project.
David had the
project of building God a temple, a temple he was forbidden from building.
Yet he realised
that whoever will build it would require immense resources.
He therefore
transferred any extra resource he got, from the spoils of war to tribute to
personal gifts, into that single project.
Transferring all
giving directed at me to ministry would more or less make me incorruptible.
Since corruption at its root is using communal resources to meet personal needs,
or transferring communal resources into personal purses.
Incidentally,
organisations and governments have that clearly spelt out in their statutes;
that anything a leader receives by virtue of his position belongs to the
organisation he serves.
There is a case
involving a former leader being charged with personalising a watch he had
received while on a tour in a foreign country. Simply because at the time he
received it he had been representing the country he was then leading.
But few Gospel ministers
want it to apply to ministry, though that is the point at which it is most
applicable.
And I say this
because there is nothing in us as ministers that draws giving to us except our
association with God and His work.
Many people
equate giving anything to a minister with giving it to God
My person fades
into insignificance when taken out of the context of ministry.
Nobody thinks of
the tribe of a minister before giving anything to them. Nobody thinks of their
filial relationship to a minister before giving anything to them.
Personalising
gifts is therefore as corrupt as in the case this former leader is dealing with,
only that God never takes us to a physical court.
Allow me to
demonstrate the beauty of dealing with gifts David’s way.
Imagine someone
giving you a very expensive Bible for your use and you in turn give it to a
fellow minister because you realise he needs it more than you do.
You have
released three people from the ensnaring a gift normally does.
The giver has no
way to connect his gift to you or the final recipient. And you have nothing
tying you to the giver or recipient because you have become a channel for both.
And I have seen a lot of that happening in my ministry.
I must hold the
gift for me to share the purse.
Doing that also
gives givers an opportunity to see first hand why you are in the ministry God
has called you to and appreciate it.
They can then
entrust more resources to you because they know there is nothing personal in
your ministry.
They will stop
looking for places and issues to give to because they know there is a safe hand
to do it.
Of course, it
will kill the manipulator because he will know that nothing he gives will stick
on your person. He will also be thanked not for his personal gift as
manipulators require but as a minister.
Gifts are
powerful.
It means that
the easier we learn to dissipate their power, the easier it becomes to escape
from their grip.
A conduit is not
easily polluted due to its way of operating.
A river is always
fresh because it is always passing along what it receives.
Lakes and oceans
become salty because they continue receiving water yet do not release any,
meaning that only evaporation that releases water, increasing the concentration
of other materials and sediment.
And I have seen
that in the course of my ministry
Many times, God
would tell me that the moneys (or portions of them) I receive are not mine and
that He will send somebody to take them. And someone would come to me with the
exact amount God had indicated was not mine to use.
And the same has
also happened with resources where I would be gifted and God indicates that the
gift was not mine, many times directing me to the ones needing them.
This releases me
to listen to God concerning the things He allows to pass through my hands as
opposed to hoarding them to the point of becoming a dead sea.
It is evident
many ministers become uselessly salty through the gifts God allows them to
handle.
Worse is that it
opens them to entrapment by the sources of those gifts.
I know that this
is a hard teaching.
But do we have
any choice, really?
No comments:
Post a Comment