I want us to look at grace in
these two ways.
This is in response to the many
confused and mixed teachings on the same from many sides.
Imagine that you are from a very
poor background yet are very bright.
A business or family is touched
by your plight and decides to take care of your academics to the very end. You
therefore are able to get to the very top and get a very good job, a job people
only dream of.
What will happen to you? How will
you behave toward others?
Two outcomes always stand out.
One asks this question, where
could I be if they did not assist me?
The other will ask, what could they
have done with their CSR if they did not find me?
One will feel so grateful that it
will completely transform his whole outlook of life. He will become gracious.
The other will feel like he did the benefactor a favor as (he thinks) there was
no other bright child they could have found.
Take that to the spiritual realm
and you will understand what I mean.
There are these believers who are
proficient in showing that since Christ died for our sins, it is a sin to
address sin in the believer. This means that they will not address sin in their
congregations or even their lives since they have already been justified.
Incidentally you find them being
so judgmental on people believing otherwise.
That is the entitlement I am
talking about. They feel as if they did God a favor to receive His salvation
and that He is duty bound to give them a free pass to do anything they wanted.
Like I wrote about Solomon
recently, they believe that God owes them one.
Yet that is not the reason we
hate and run away from sin. You see God did not have to love me. Christ did not
have to die for my sins. He does not have to save me.
Yet He did.
And for that I am grateful;
eternally grateful.
A recipient of grace cannot help
but be graceful. Unless they think they qualified for it. And that is the
entitlement I am talking about.
As usual I use Biblical stories.
Saul made David an outlaw because
he had somehow convinced himself that he deserved being king. In other words
the kingdom was his by right and not privilege or favor. Jonathan his son was
aware of the heavenly mandate and so was gracious when he dealt with David.
We see the same with David when
he is overthrown. He can afford to extend grace to the rebel and all the
pillars and movers of the same.
All because he was confident that
his kingdom was a gift from above.
He does not even seek to defend
God’s promise to him concerning that kingdom.
Gratitude begets grace.
Entitlement begets war to defend what one believes he owns. That is why anybody
with a different opinion is treated as an enemy. They can defend their doctrine
with blows.
I remember being ejected from the
leadership of a Christian Union because I opposed a preacher preaching a
contrary message. And I had approached him in private as Jesus said. The
chairman and his team could not entertain us examining the scriptures as they
feared confronting the error of their doctrinal positions.
That is the danger of
entitlement. You must defend what you believe is rightfully yours, even if it
was a gift given to whoever will. You could even offend the giver as you defend
the gift.
How do you relate with those of
an opposed doctrinal position to yours?
What about those who do not understand
the Holy Spirit like you do?
What about those understanding
what worship is differently from you?
Do you exhibit gratitude or
entitlement? And are your opponents sinners saved by grace as you are or do you
treat them as renegades?
No comments:
Post a Comment