I want to open our eyes to the spiritual realities that govern our lives all the time.
Though many think of these realities as
superstition and primitivity, I want us to realise that they are as portent as
those superstitious characters paint them, sometimes more.
I want us to look at a few practices in our
past that may be construed as wicked and immoral when the purpose for them was
the inherent spiritual realities.
Not many people have a clue about the causes of
some things that happen to them. Not many understand why things happen to them.
Over time, however, a pattern may appear to lead
the victim to associating the events to some dark moments in their forebears, a
consequence of some of their actions.
Let me start with the Bible.
We really do not know why Canaan was cursed by
his grandfather. It is probable that he was the culprit in what happened to
Noah and that Ham was just a witness who was unable or unwilling to, like Eli,
stop what was happening, whatever it was since Canaan was his last born.
Noah did not curse Ham, the witness and father
to the perpetrator (my theory).
He cursed Canaan.
You will of course tell me that this is not in
the Bible, and I will agree.
But whoever cursed an innocent person, a
grandson nonetheless? Why would he curse him anyway?
As the bird by wandering, as the swallow by
flying, so the curse causeless shall not come. (Proverbs 26:2)
As I have explained many times, curses and
blessings are simply consequences of our actions.
Their power lies in the power God has to reward
or punish. And He does this as the ultimate judge of everything He created.
What land was Israel promised? Was it not
Canaan?
That was centuries later. Yet the Canaanites
paid for the sin of their father.
That is what I mean by spiritual realities.
Many Canaanites might have been completely
unaware of the curse or the cause of the same. Yet that did not stop the same
curse dispossessing and eventually obliterating them.
We have the Gospel and so for much of this post
I will not dwell on believers.
In the past, people were very literate about
spiritual realities. Though it is called superstition, it is actually a
response to the prevailing spiritual realities.
They therefore went to great pains to insure
themselves against repercussions of the same.
They knew that a curse must land. They knew
that a broken vow must be dealt with. They of course knew that the good done
must be rewarded. They had learnt that by observation of the spiritual realities
around them.
I do not know whether you realise that taboos,
among many other cultural norms were in the backdrop of such realities.
For as I passed by, and beheld your devotions,
I found an altar with this inscription, TO THE UNKNOWN GOD. Whom therefore ye
ignorantly worship, him declare I unto you. (Acts 17:23)
There are some cultural practices that were
guided by the fear of some of those unknown repercussions.
What we now know as open sin was then just a
precaution against unseen dangers.
Allow me to give one or two examples.
We are told that agemates shared wives.
But that is not the whole truth.
Remember Jeroboam and Baasha and Ahab? God had
determined to clear the whole male population.
It did not stop there.
As communities grew, the reality of such a
curse on an individual (who would later become a clan then a nation), such a
judgment could be seen by simple observation.
Now, since as I have said earlier nobody really
knows what their forebears had exposed them to, it was wise to take insurance
against such an eventuality.
That is why for most communities it was
advisable for a man to have at least one son who was not of his blood.
Then, in case such a curse existed, there would
be someone to carry his name when that spiritual cleansing occurred.
It was not simply a woman sleeping with a
random man out there. That man was properly vetted to ensure that he does not
bring about another curse and also that he was not in the same clan. And it was
also very private so that nobody outside that close circle got to know it since
adultery was sin even in the culture and liable to bring about judgment.
Our generation has just poured scum on that
practice and made it mainstream and even public because we want to modernize
sin as if there are no consequences for it.
It was the same when a man was infertile.
Again, it was in a very private way that a man
to impregnate his wife was sought so that the secret never got out and the man
be shamed. Nobody outside that close circle ever got to know of the execution
of that plan. The fear of the curse was the reason for the same.
Many people associate abortion with the modern
times.
But do you know it existed in our cultures?
But it was not because of unplanned pregnancies
as we think nowadays.
It happened because of a spiritual breach.
We do not associate our past with incest
because there is not the slightest hint of the same.
But we know that our forefathers were not holy.
It means that young men were just like our
young men and that however guarded they were ‘accidents’ even then happened.
But incest was an abomination, among the most
dreaded causes of a curse.
That is why you will never hear of cases of
children born from relatives. They dealt with that curse swiftly.
Have you ever wondered what guided adoptions in
our past?
When someone realised he was walking in a type
of curse and had no way of reversing it because he did not know its cause he
would then resort to making a break with that past by effectively asking to
transfer to a family that did not have such curses.
He would then be ‘born’ into that family,
requiring a sacrifice of sorts and he would then be a full member of that
family.
Incidentally, even whole clans would shift, but
then to another spiritual structure altogether, a different nation or what in
our days we call tribe. Then they would have made a clean break from any
shackles holding them back since the new structure has no spiritual
relationship with the old.
These are things I have seen and heard a lot
about as I listened to old men.
Incidentally we see the same even in the Bible.
Why is this minister dwelling on the past? I
know someone is wondering.
Spiritual realities do not stop existing
because we become modern. They do not pause because we become believers. They
do not become nonexistent because we are ignorant of their existence.
The Gospel does not kill spiritual realities.
The Gospel is a spiritual reality. It operates as a spiritual reality at all
times.
Understanding the Gospel is actually
understanding spiritual reality. Understanding the scriptures is the key to
understanding spiritual realities and knowing how to live.
Many preachers have abused the ignorance of
their flocks about spiritual realities to mint a tidy sum from them. This is
what guides this post.
What is a generational curse? What is the
solution for a generational curse?
I have explained how culture dealt with the
whole topic of generational curses.
Allow me to repeat that a curse is the
consequence of an action, actions, behaviors, attitudes, etc. someone has done.
It is a judgment from the spiritual realm for something someone did.
This means that only spiritual intervention has
the capacity of dealing with them.
And since it is directed at a person or the
structure a person created, only that person or a person in the structure has
the authority to deal with it. No proxies have the authority to deal with a
structure they are not a part of.
The truth is that those imposters calling
themselves experts on deliverance and generational curses are simply charlatans
feeding on the misery of the ignorant.
Only, and I repeat, only Christ has the
authority to deal with those spiritual dynamics, and not through proxies.
The exciting truth is that He dealt them a
death blow on the cross.
That victory is available to everybody who has
believed in Christ and walks in obedience to Him. It is not the preserve of a
few or chosen ones who must sell that power to the needy believers.
Reading the scriptures and living according to
that revelation is the route to accessing that power.
One time I was called to someone who was
experiencing a lot of spiritual oppression or whatever people would want to
call it.
My response was walking them through the
scriptures to show them not only what Christ had accomplished on the cross but
to also show them how possible it was for them to access that victory. I led
them to Christ and gave them materials to help them grow in their Christian
lives.
It is interesting that they were not very
pleased with my ministration because I did not have the drama many associate
with such ministry.
But I do not do things because people are doing
them. I do them because I am convicted by the Holy Spirit through the
scriptures that it is the cause of action I should take.
Teach obedience and you will deal with the
worst the devil can release.
Stray however little and you will be led into a
maze of incessant drama that will never allow you the smallest rest because of
all the busyness those activities will require.
The same applies even to what people call
generational curses. A surrender and submission to the Lordship of Christ is
the antidote, the only one.
That is why, apart from exposing God’s people
to His word, the next thing I do is teach lordship, the Lordship of Christ.
You see, nothing else has any chance at dealing
with the spiritual realities I have been talking about.
We will see that even in the Old Testament there
were very many people who did what I have explained and got rid of the curse
that was part of their being.
Ruth is one of them. She was able to get into
the mainstream of God’s people because she trashed her gods and the security
they represented.
Another one was Rahab the harlot.
As I have said many times, she was a despicable
character in a condemned city. Yet she was able by her choices to connect to
the God of Israel.
In David’s army were many such characters who
had disconnected from their gods to become Israelites, among them Uriah the
Hittite.
And the Bible treats them as the Israelites
their conversion (since that is what happens once someone leaves their gods)
had made them to be.
Is that different from the adoption that used
to happen in our cultures?
The greatest highlight in this is the single non-negotiable
present whichever situation you look at.
When someone changed tribes, for example, they
left everything; name, language, family.
When an adult was adopted as I have earlier
said, they also left everything; relatives, family.
They did not have any vestiges of their past apart
from the fact that they came from somewhere.
I was shown a subclan in the clan I come from
that was born into our clan. Nothing but the past distinguishes them from the
rest of us.
From my understanding, it is the spiritual
vestiges of the past that are the cause of generational curses.
What I mean is this; someone has not made a
clean break of the past when making their commitment to Christ. In short, they
are not born again because they did not die to their past.
Let me explain.
What was Abraham ordered?
Make a clean break with your past so that I can
make a new thing out of you. It even took the death of his father for him to
realise the enormity of that order.
It was not ‘negotiate a separation or departure’.
Yet that is what we are always doing,
especially with our spiritual roots.
One or two times I have been made a spokesman
in the dowry negotiations and it is astounding how low believers can stoop.
The most memorable I can remember is when all
of us introduce ourselves and basically everybody in both teams is a believer.
Then the demands start streaming and you wonder
the kind of Christ we were confessing.
That time I stopped the discussion (I represented
the boy).
Then I asked a simple question.
I thought from our introductions that we are
all believers. And our children are also believers.
Why then are we going back to things that have
no bearing with our confession?
Then the whole dynamic changed.
It is those spiritual vestiges I am talking
about.
The early church did not deal with them because
it was clear to everybody coming to Christ that they had to spiritually
disconnect from their spiritual roots.
That is why there is not a single instance of
deliverance in the Bible.
My faith demands that I completely detach from
my spiritual heritage and sink into God’s swamp of forgiveness and its
resultant holiness.
Otherwise those spiritual tentacles that I refuse
to excise from me will eventually finish me.
But if ye will not drive out the inhabitants of
the land from before you; then it shall come to pass, that those which ye let
remain of them shall be pricks in your eyes, and thorns in your sides, and
shall vex you in the land wherein ye dwell. (Numbers 33:55)
I hope I have made my point.
No comments:
Post a Comment