Ladies and Gentlemen?

A gentleman is not the lady’s husband but her slave. A lady’s husband is a lord. A gentleman is simply the slave a lord gets to serve his wife.

In all probability, a gentleman is a eunuch, a half man entrusted with the care of a lady without threatening the lord’s seed.

It is therefore abuse of the family when we use a gentleman as the ideal man. That is simply the corruption of the family structure by feminizing and emasculating the husband. In fact gentleness is not among the traits of a man but of a woman, especially a mother

A man who is the servant of a lady has no capacity to exercise authority over her. Even worse is the fact that he will have no authority over his children as she is the one who calls the shots in the home. No wonder we have sons who are confused and prefer to look girlish as it is the lady who is in charge at home. Such a man simply exists to enhance his boss.

A husband does not exist to meet the whims of his wife. A slave does. A man does not exist to take his wife wherever she desires. A man lives to get clear direction from God to lead his wife and children in God’s direction.

Ladies and gentlemen is therefore not a proper address where a husband is. It is an address for a ladies only meeting as the ladies will have gentlemen for escorts and servants. In fact I suspect there may be no forum where lords and ladies are together as each has their own level and circle of authority. And it is against protocol to mention ladies before their lords in the address anyway.

Opening doors and pushing chairs for his wife may appear admirable, but that is the last thing to give him any worth as a man. Issuing orders to her is more responsible for him.

As an aside why is a king’s wife a queen yet a queen’s husband is a prince? Simply for the same reason. A queen’s husband is simply the provider of the seed for royalty. Recognizing him as the king will simply shift royalty to another family. He is therefore the official inseminator for the royal family, and that simply because there is no other respectable way for a queen to get that seed. That is the reason his children are not named after him as they are not legally his. He could as well die after inseminating the queen.

No wonder the European missionary corrupted Christianity as they adapted the Bible to their traditions and customs. I do not think they did it wittingly; they just wanted to understand the Bible and Christianity in their context which was very different from the Biblical context. But the saddest thing was that they packaged that corruption as Christianity to people whose customs and language happened to be closer to the Biblical context.

They therefore caused those nations to unlearn customs that could make them understand the gospel easily and introducing their customs instead. This made someone who converted more European than Christian. They insisted on them taking European names, wearing European attire, running their families in a European way and in short become European in all but their locale and color. Christian became interchangeable with European.

This might be the reason Christian marriages are crumbling faster than any other section of population. Because we are following concepts that not only are unscriptural but also unnatural. For example the seed belongs to the man. It is corruption to apportion the same to a woman, however queenly she may be. A woman finds her security in submitting to a husband. Having the man hide under her shadow is abominable to God who created those structures, however logical they look.

I believe the solution to all this mess is taking the Bible as it is without using the shades of our background to understand it. Then these things will take the form God has determined for those who take Him seriously enough to follow Him as He has revealed.

I know this is a provocation and that many are rearing to throw stones at me, especially ladies and their gentlemen. I have not even placed any verses as I am looking for proper Biblical interaction. Let the verses flow. But do not fear to join this debate. However let us constrain it to the Bible. I have simply used my little understanding of English and the English to start it off.

God bless you