Conspirational Questions

Is it not interesting that the longer I continue following this corona narrative the more questions I have? Why doesn’t the media ask those simple questions or the authorities explain them so that we do not need to ask? Why is it that conspiracy theories are more convincing than the official position wherever you look?

I know some are already angry with me. I once asked a question and was shouted out instead of being given answers by the medical experts in the group. But I will ask other questions today.

From official sources it is said that about 70% of corona deaths are attributable to diabetes and a bit of the remaining percentage to other such conditions.

Allow me to ask this. What is more logical between fighting the virus and a disease we have been handling for a long time? Why not look for people we suspect (many times we know them) may have diabetes so that we can destabilize the virus before it arrives? Why search with a toothcomb a virus that is for the most part asymptomatic when we can run an awareness program and get most of the persons with diabetes to arm them against the virus? Why don’t we develop a more portent treatment regimen against diabetes and similar conditions especially as we have always been told diabetes has a lot to do with lifestyle and diet?

Isn’t sending those above 58 home and banning them from even going to church a sure way of killing them since you are condemning them to inactivity that increases such conditions? Won’t their bodies die of that inactivity and become even weaker and more prone to the virus should it strike? Could we be sending these old people (and I am approaching there) to an early grave?

Why are we not using the same strategy against the virus that we successfully used against HIV that very few now care whether it has a vaccine or not?

My younger children long ago asked me a question I want to ask.

We have been told that the virus spreads through infected droplets of saliva and mucus. Why then must they mine very deep into the nose and mouth to get samples? Why do they not just ask for saliva or mucus to get the virus like they do other diseases? What is in those deeper recesses of the nose and mouth that are not in the droplets that infect?

We have also been told that the virus cannot be treated, that anyone who says they have found treatment is lying. How come then that we have people coming out negative after treatment? As an example using HIV, treatment deals with reducing the viral load and not killing the virus. As such no treatment has been able to make a HIV positive person negative according to the experts. How then can we have the virus turning negative when at the same time saying that there is no treatment?

In the same way, if there is treatment (that the powers are denying but demonstrating otherwise), why then are we not building on the treatment? Why must we be working on testing vaccines that normally takes decades to develop on the fast lane instead of developing the same drugs that are treating it especially since they are drugs that have been developed and tested for enough time?

And finally, do riots arm people against the virus? Do crowds repel it? Why is it that the weeks of protests did nothing to flood the world with death from the same?

You can now get angry as I have stopped. Then I may have to ask more as there are very many others I have or have been asked without a satisfactory answer.